The married couple who challenged Black Horse in the courts after discovering the vast majority of the cost of a PPI policy premium they had purchased was commission have given up their legal challenge and withdrawn their appeal to the Supreme Court.

The news will come as a blow to the claims management industry, potentially diminishing the rich pool of grievances that has fuelled their notoriously predatory business over recent years.

Go deeper with GlobalData

Data Insights

The gold standard of business intelligence.

Find out more

Black Horse lent the Harrisons £60,000 and sold them PPI for £10,200, the commission on which was 87% of the premium. The Harrisons claimed this was unfair. However both the High Court and the Court of Appeal ruled otherwise, in favour of the lender.

Russell Kelsall, senior associate at solicitors Squire Sanders says that this area of the law is now clear. He said: “If a lender or intermediary has failed to disclose either the existence and/or the amount of any commission, this does not create any unfairness in the relationship between the parties within the meaning of Section 140A of the Consumer Credit Act 1974

“If there is a claim against a lender or intermediary alleging that the payment protection insurance was expensive or overly costly, this claim must fail."

Lord Justice Tomlinson in the Court of Appeal had decided that an intermediary is under no obligation to advise a borrower that the same cover could have been obtained more cheaply elsewhere.

How well do you really know your competitors?

Access the most comprehensive Company Profiles on the market, powered by GlobalData. Save hours of research. Gain competitive edge.

Company Profile – free sample

Thank you!

Your download email will arrive shortly

Not ready to buy yet? Download a free sample

We are confident about the unique quality of our Company Profiles. However, we want you to make the most beneficial decision for your business, so we offer a free sample that you can download by submitting the below form

By GlobalData
Visit our Privacy Policy for more information about our services, how we may use, process and share your personal data, including information of your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications. Our services are intended for corporate subscribers and you warrant that the email address submitted is your corporate email address.

The judge also stated that charging a high price for a product which is freely and readily available more cheaply in the market would be met with incomprehension in any other context.